I've updated the draft opinion in the case directory adding details
taken from inception review, as well as from some responses to the
issues file by the project team that were given to me out-of-band. I've
reset the timer for 2/29, as a result. Please have another look. Thanks.
-- Garrett
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Gary Winiger wrote:
>>> 4. Opinion
>>>
>>> No issues were raised for the project team at commitment
>>> review.
>>>
>>
>> There seemed to be issues discussed at the inception review.
>> Were none of them worthy enough to note in the opinion?
>>
>> Gary..
>>
>
> There were issues at inception, indeed. They had all been resolved
> before commitment though. I am uncertain what the procedure is for
> noting issues that are resolved before a project comes for commitment
> -- certainly there was no advice or discussion at commitment.
>
> Put another way, I _thought_ that the opinion does not stand alone,
> but exists in conjunction with the case materials. Those case
> materials (the commitment versions) had, I presume, been found
> acceptable without need or desire for change. So I called out a
> reference to them, and didn't mention it further.
>
> Admittedly, I'm still new to the process here, but if there is
> something else that folks would like this opinion to reflect, I'm
> happy to change it. In such a case, though, I'd like to have a little
> more guidance as to what should or should not be recorded in the opinion.
>
> -- Garrett
