On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:00:08 +0000 Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote:
> James C. McPherson wrote: > > The name "fwflash" was suggested by PSARC in an earlier > > case and agreed to by that particular project team. > > > > In your opinion, which aspect of the name "fwflash" is > > not descriptive enough, and what do you suggest we call > > this utility instead? > > I don't see changing the name of the already existing fwflash command > is in scope for this project. fwflash(1M) was declared as Stable in > 2005/126 which makes it Committed in the new taxonomy. This case > needs "patch" release binding so changing the name is not an option. I totally agree. James -- Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris Sun Microsystems http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
