Darren Kenny wrote:
> I need to make a correction on my original statement.
>
> As I see it right now the main issue is the inconsistency between mv and
> nautilus - I've done a scan of the nautilus code to see exactly how it's doing
> things and it turns out that the code that handles this is actually
> implemented
> in form a file-monitor.[1]
>
> This means that nautilus *should* notice the change whether it's done using
> nautilus itself or the mv command - provided the user is logged in at the time
> and running nautilus.
>
> Saying that - this doesn't seem to be working at present (which is why I
> didn't
> see any reflection in the config file when I used mv) - so I see this as a bug
> in nautilus which I will follow up on with the community, since it doesn't
> appear to be working on Linux either.
If so, then I'm satisfied and we can drop this issue.
Thanks for the additional insight.
-John
