Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:19:11PM +0000, Peter Dennis wrote:
> > Now having said that I like the idea that was mentioned - pax with
> > the various format support that sounds like a Very Sensible Approach
> > but how would that fit with someone who does not know that pax does
> > it but unzoo does ? Which is a better approach.
>
> If you could make pax(1) support unzooing then you could deliver a
> /bin/unzoo shell script that prints an error message telling you to use
> pax(1) :)
What do you understand by pax(1)?
The pax binary in /usr/bin on Solaris is closed source and it makes no sense to
even think about enhancing it.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
