>Eh? Every ARC case publishes stability. That stability goes into >manpages. If we can't indicate through ARC what things people can >safely build on, there's really something horribly wrong and ARC should >deliver tools to publish what it spends so much time talking about.
So do we need to make this explicit so that there's a value you can get at runtime whether how much is supported? (Or colorls (shudder) which lists unsupported FOSS in red [2 colors only]) Casper
