Joseph Kowalski wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> >> 4.3.4 Unison does not understand hard links.
> > That's pretty unfortunate.  I guess the necessary consequence of this
> > is that Unison my dramatically increase the bandwidth needs and
> > storage needs on the remote side.  Imagine synchronizing a 4G ISO
> > image, which also has hardlinks to other names -- instead of
> > transferring and storing one 4G image, you are transferring and
> > storing n * 4G.
>
> Yea, but who actually does this?

At least I do it - and many applications and users will do it, too. And
a look at usr/src/pkgdefs/ shows many many hardlinks being used in the
package system, too.

> The common use of hardlinks went away
> with AT&T supporting UNIX.

Huh ? Could you please give further details on the relationship between
AT&T and hardlinks ?

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)

Reply via email to