>Do you have an "AT&T" Source to check? I did not see a single SVr3 installation >without symlinks. They have however been unusable because there only was a >symlink(1) command and the symlink(2) syscall instead of "ln -s" and with >ls(1) >you could only guess that there have been symlinks because if the missing >lstat(2).
Yes. And assuming it is properly indexed, it does not show readlink(), symlink(), S_IFLNK nor does it list S_IFLNK in <sys/stat.h> The same indexing, BTW, does show those identifiers in SysVr4. Casper
