Nicolas Williams wrote: > All what John Plocher said. +1 > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:13:18AM -0700, John Plocher wrote: > >> 300-message fasttracks, ratholes about filesystem(5) and beating >> up Bart all fall into the "adds so much negative value that we >> should simply shoot the horse and get over it" bucket that it >> is not surprising that people would rather find ways to avoid >> the process... >> > > It might help to conduct reviews in a somewhat more closed way, without > being entirely closed. Allow ARC members, case sponsors and i-team > members to post unfettered, while everyone else can follow the review > but their posts are moderated, all on a per-case basis. > > (Yes, I might not even get to post this then.) >
Why we still do architecture review, or discussions, over email is beyond me. Email is horrible tool for such things. Con-calls are a close second.
