On Aug 24, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Bruce Rothermal <Bruce.Rothermal at sun.com> wrote:
> My opinion also but then you can't sell support for code that is > only contributed. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > That begs at least two questions: A. Why not? It hardly seems a physical law that support cannot be offered on "contributed" items. 2. How do support plans determine architecture? And probably: III. If there's a larger architecture here, it can't be ignored; it needs to be part of the ARC review (closed if necessary). Has it been described?