I can +1 it. I did look at it last week but forgot to send out mail. -edh
John Fischer wrote: > Lloyd, > > I think that the status for this case should be "closed not reviewed". > Please see the following email for details: > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/2008-October/011763.html > > > > Basically, no one has stated that they have read the fast track and > issued the required +1. There are 2 options. First, you can extend the > timer 1 week asking for review from the committee. Second, you can > close the case as "closed not reviewed". > > Please note that there is an on-going conversation within the community > to clarify the policy but it currently states that you need a +1 or > someone to ask questions. > > Thanks, > > John > > Lloyd Chambers wrote: >> This case has timed out with no comments. I am marking it Close >> Approved. >> >> Lloyd >> >> On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Lloyd Chambers wrote: >> >>> It is my intention to mark this case Closed Approved as per the case >>> timeout unless there are comments prior to COB then. >>> >>> ?Lloyd >>> >>> On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Lloyd Chambers wrote: >>> >>>> I am sponsoring this case for the Sailfin team. The timeout is >>>> 10/26/2009. >>>> >>>> http://sac.eng/arc/LSARC/2009/568 >>>> >>>> We briefly discussed this case today at LSARC, and there was some >>>> confusion about the email log and why the case had not appeared >>>> normally (it was sent to one-pager on 10/13). >>>> >>>> Due to release schedule, the team is eager to see this case >>>> approved. I'm hoping that another ARC member can take a look >>>> quickly and either raise issues or +1 the case by this Friday, >>>> thank you. >>>> >>>> Lloyd Chambers >>>> GlassFish Team >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Lloyd Chambers >>> lloyd.chambers at sun.com >>> GlassFish Team >>> >>> >>> >> >> Lloyd Chambers >> lloyd.chambers at sun.com >> GlassFish Team >> >> >>
