Jim Walker wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> Can you add *which* kstats are being used? Individual kstats are >> normally not documented, and some of them are more volatile than >> others. If this case is going to use kstats, then I think we need to >> document which ones are used in case someone decides to change them >> in the future. > > Appendix A. in the proposal file has been updated to include the > individual kstat information. > > Cheers, > Jim
Thanks. The stats you're using look reasonable to me, but I'd like to hear from someone more familiar with the VM subsystem -- the anoninfo and cpu_vminfo stats might be unreliable... - Garrett