Jim Walker wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> Can you add *which* kstats are being used?  Individual kstats are 
>> normally not documented, and some of them are more volatile than 
>> others.  If this case is going to use kstats, then I think we need to 
>> document which ones are used in case someone decides to change them 
>> in the future.
>
> Appendix A. in the proposal file has been updated to include the
> individual kstat information.
>
> Cheers,
> Jim

Thanks.  The stats you're using look reasonable to me, but I'd like to 
hear from someone more familiar with the VM subsystem -- the anoninfo 
and cpu_vminfo stats might be unreliable...

    - Garrett

Reply via email to