Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Jim Walker wrote: >> Garrett D'Amore wrote: >>> Can you add *which* kstats are being used? Individual kstats are >>> normally not documented, and some of them are more volatile than >>> others. If this case is going to use kstats, then I think we need to >>> document which ones are used in case someone decides to change them >>> in the future. >> >> Appendix A. in the proposal file has been updated to include the >> individual kstat information. >> >> Cheers, >> Jim > > Thanks. The stats you're using look reasonable to me, but I'd like to > hear from someone more familiar with the VM subsystem -- the anoninfo > and cpu_vminfo stats might be unreliable...
Here are the anoninfo and cpu_vminfo stats being used. anoninfo.ani_max; anoninfo.ani_resv; cpu_vminfo.pgpgin; cpu_vminfo.pgpgout; Can someone knowledgeable give an idea of their reliability? Currently, we are assuming they are as reliable as any other stat. I would like to wrap up this case. Here's the full proposal: http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/583/proposal.txt Cheers, Jim
