Hi Garrett, Thank you for your prompt review and +1! I think PSARC is the adequate review body since the recent similar case ([2] xkbc for iBus) and also all other Input Method related cases were reviewed under PSARC.
Fuyuki On 2010?02?24? 18:17, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I'm not entirely sure that PSARC is the right place to deal with this. > Would LSARC be better prepared to provide a meaningful review of it? > (It *looks* reasonable to me, and I'd +1, but I'd like LSARC to have a > chance at it first.) > > - Garrett >> >> REFERENCES >> >> [1] iBus project ( http://code.google.com/p/ibus/ ) >> PSARC 2009/499 iBus integration >> >> [2] xkbc for iBus >> PSARC/2009/645 Keyboard layout emulation engine for iBus >> >> [3] IIIMF project ( http://www.openi18n.org/iiimf/ ) >> PSARC 2005/525 IIIMF upgrade to revision 12 >> >> [4] SCIM project ( http://www.scim-im.org ) >> PSARC 2008/418 Integrate SCIM to Solaris >> >> [5] Pinyin Method >> Pinyin Method - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinyin_method >> 12 Double Pinyin - >> http://www.4jhm.com/sgsp/2008/1108/article_9.html >>
