On 03/ 8/10 10:29 PM, Fuyuki Hasegawa - Sun Microsystems wrote: > Sebastien Roy wrote: >> On 03/ 8/10 01:04 AM, Fuyuki Hasegawa - Sun Microsystems wrote: >>> This case has been approved with +1. >>> >> >> I did give this case a +1, but there is still an unanswered question >> (see my mail from the 3rd). Please answer that question before >> approving the case. >> >> -Seb > > Oh, somehow I removed PSARC-ext at sun.com alias when I replied this...
No problem. > When iBus becomes more stable in future, scim may be removed. 2009/499 also discussed the need for feature parity between iiimf and ibus (specifically regarding keyboard layout switching for European layouts). Those details are obviously beyond the scope of this case, but my main concern was that the more enhancements are made to ibus (such as this case) and the more mature it gets, the more antiquated our current default becomes, and the less it makes sense to maintain it as the default. I don't intend to discuss those issues in detail here, but only to state my general concern. Thanks, -Seb P.S.: When you approve this case and edit the IAM file, please fix the date format in there, it's currently unparsable by the SAC tools.
