Thanks Albert for answering the questions for me :) Agreed on all counts. On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 20:48 -0400, Albert Lee wrote: > > > The initial request in my original comment was for the stability level > > of the spec file syntax. I would guess that it's relatively stable > > since you mention below that it has no concept of versioning, and > > presumably the format has been used for rpm's for Linux for a very long > > time. Is it Committed, Uncommitted, ...? > > > > I have to defer to laca on this one since it's his case. Uncommitted is > probably not unreasonable since packages are already forced to stay in > lock-step with external changes anyway.
Uncommitted sounds good to me. Laca _______________________________________________ opensolaris-arc mailing list [email protected]
