Peter Memishian wrote: > > > > > > ppsym.c => ppsym and probe.sh => probe > > > > > > > > > > In that case, it seems odd to check `probe' in under SCCS control, > right? > > > > > > > > Depends... we already have a couple of "intermediate files" (like the > > > > results of the "iffe"-probes) in the tree... > > > > > > What would one use the checked-in "probe" for? > > > > In theory it could be used to update the list of CPP symbols set by > > default (Ok, it's unlikely that we have to look at this before OS/Net > > switches to Sun Studio 12 (and the current codebase compiles with Studio > > 12EA without problems (which means there isn't anything we have to worry > > about (I've spend the last couple of hours testing that...)))). > > ... and that cannot be done by rebuilding "probe" from the checked-in > sources?
Yes, that can be done... I added the "probe" scripts on the list of "files which will be deleted" for the putback (these scripts are on the border of our little "galaxy" anyway) ... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
