* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 13:29]: > >>>>> "Roland" == Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Roland> - Should I add support for Mercuial and GIT, too ? > > As far as patching ON code, we're not planning on using GIT, so I > wouldn't bother trying to support it. I don't know if the upstream Perl > maintainers would be interested. > > Mercurial has a single tree under .hg at the top of the entire > workspace. (As opposed to Subversion, which puts a .svn subdirectory in > every source directory.) So unless I'm missing something, there's no > need to do anything for Mercurial, either.
I suppose the natural question is whether this fix should be submitted to upstream in parallel or in preference. (ON doesn't use Subversion directly, so it's somewhat perplexing in an ON-specific patch...) - Stephen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
