Mike Kupfer wrote: > > >>>>> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > sch> I suppose the natural question is whether this fix should be > sch> submitted to upstream in parallel or in preference. (ON doesn't > sch> use Subversion directly, so it's somewhat perplexing in an > sch> ON-specific patch...) > > I was thinking that the Subversion support would be useful for people > who are working from the repo on genunix.org. > > But now that you mention it, the initial ksh93 work is getting close to > done, and we probably want to encourage anyone else to migrate to > Mercurial anyway...
Ok... but it would still be "nice" to allow alternate version control software (as I said elsewhere I am a huge fan of alternatives) ... ... BTW: I guess some of the follow-ups of the ksh93-integration project will still be Subversion based since they may use branches from that tree (e.g. shcomp/shbinexec&co.) ... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
