On 5/2/07, Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/1/07, Richard L. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone see my point about decluttering df, and maybe about the latter
approach being the
> cleanest? If so, what would be the best strategy for RFEs/ARC cases: one,
two, or fully broken
> out? More to the point, any _objections to that approach? If not, some day
soon I think I'll
> write some patches to add the "iignore" option to those filesystems.
I think that it is something that should be done. The ignore option
sounds reasonable to me, although from a generic standpoint I am not
sure what "ignore" really means as a mount option. Maybe the right
option is "pseudo" or "nospace" but the general approach and intended
outcome is quite desirable.
See also the following blog entry:
http://blogs.sun.com/tdh/entry/a_design_choice_with_the
(Yes, I too want a decluttered df, and setting the ignore flag
seems to me to be the most straightforward way.)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
