Peter Memishian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyone think maybe _FIOSATIME ioctl ought to be supported on more
> > (ideally all) filesystems, and promoted from private to something more
> > widely usable? Seems to me any really transparent backup utility would
> > like to be able to do this, to not mess up atime as a consequence of
> > backing up the file, nor ctime as a consequence of restoring the
> > pre-backup atime.
>
> If we do decide to promote such a facility, I'd hope we'd find a less ugly
> interface for it.
What is is that you don't like?
What I like to see for any of the set time interfaces for files is support
for nanoseconds.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
