> > If we do decide to promote such a facility, I'd hope we'd find a less ugly > > interface for it. > > What is is that you don't like?
For one, the leading underscore in the ioctl name (which is clearly implementation namespace). For two, the fact that it's conceptually divorced from the utimes(2) family. -- meem _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
