Joachim Worringen schrieb: > Greetings, > > just installed OpenSolaris 2008.05 on a new box - very nice, BUT: ld > fails to link (to do anything, actually)! > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/bin$ ldd ld > libld.so.4 => /usr/bin/../../lib/libld.so.4 > libld.so.4 (SUNWprivate_4.2) => (version not found) > libelf.so.1 => /usr/bin/../../lib/libelf.so.1 > libc.so.1 => /usr/bin/../../lib/libc.so.1 > liblddbg.so.4 => /lib/liblddbg.so.4 > libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/bin$ mcs -p ld > ld: > > @(#)SunOS 5.11 snv_86 January 2008 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/bin$ uname -a > SunOS osol 5.11 snv_86 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris > > Any clue what's going on here?
This does of course not happen right after installation, but after I installed some software. I re-installed the box and test step-by-step now. SunStudioExpress, mercurial, subversion and some Gnu autotools (installed to /usr/gnu) are off the hook. I suspect QT (one of the few remaining packages) to be the cause for this - but am afraid to kill my system again... The single google hit for this is a Sun blog entry which describes this problem as a result of inconsistent kernel/user-land updates. Maybe QT feels the need to bring its own ld - would this be possible? Joachim -- Joachim Worringen, Software Architect, Dolphin Interconnect Solutions phone ++49/(0)228/324 08 17 - http://www.dolphinics.com _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
