I suspect you need to update SUNWtoo.
But beware, due to a bug[1] this would update much of your
system to build 90 and you won't be able to boot, so
I suggest you do an image-update, details here:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/2008-June/006643.html

Laca

[1] http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/2008-June/006956.html

On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 13:44 +0200, Joachim Worringen wrote:
> Joachim Worringen schrieb:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > just installed OpenSolaris 2008.05 on a new box - very nice, BUT: ld 
> > fails to link (to do anything, actually)!
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/bin$ ldd ld
> >     libld.so.4 =>    /usr/bin/../../lib/libld.so.4
> >     libld.so.4 (SUNWprivate_4.2) =>  (version not found)
> >     libelf.so.1 =>   /usr/bin/../../lib/libelf.so.1
> >     libc.so.1 =>     /usr/bin/../../lib/libc.so.1
> >     liblddbg.so.4 =>         /lib/liblddbg.so.4
> >     libm.so.2 =>     /lib/libm.so.2
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/bin$ mcs -p ld
> > ld:
> > 
> > @(#)SunOS 5.11 snv_86 January 2008
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/bin$ uname -a
> > SunOS osol 5.11 snv_86 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
> > 
> > Any clue what's going on here?
> 
> This does of course not happen right after installation, but after I 
> installed some software. I re-installed the box and test step-by-step 
> now. SunStudioExpress, mercurial, subversion and some Gnu autotools 
> (installed to /usr/gnu) are off the hook. I suspect QT (one of the few 
> remaining packages) to be the cause for this - but am afraid to kill my 
> system again...
> 
> The single google hit for this is a Sun blog entry which describes this 
> problem as a result of inconsistent kernel/user-land updates. Maybe QT 
> feels the need to bring its own ld - would this be possible?
> 
>   Joachim
> 

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to