Roland Mainz <[email protected]> wrote: > Right... but I don't want to restrict myself to Bourne-like constructs - > IMO the _minimum_ level should _now_ (in 2009) be the POSIX shell > specification (and even that is now more than 15 years old) and AFAIK my > proposal _barely_ goes beyond that...
There is a difference between really _being_ _limited_ and using constructs just for fun. How much of the code would suffer from writing it in Bourne shell syntax? Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
