Roland Mainz <roland.ma...@nrubsig.org> wrote:
> Right... but I don't want to restrict myself to Bourne-like constructs -
> IMO the _minimum_ level should _now_ (in 2009) be the POSIX shell
> specification (and even that is now more than 15 years old) and AFAIK my
> proposal _barely_ goes beyond that...
There is a difference between really _being_ _limited_ and using constructs
just for fun. How much of the code would suffer from writing it in Bourne shell
syntax?
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
