Joerg Schilling wrote: > Roland Mainz <roland.ma...@nrubsig.org> wrote: > > Right... but I don't want to restrict myself to Bourne-like constructs - > > IMO the _minimum_ level should _now_ (in 2009) be the POSIX shell > > specification (and even that is now more than 15 years old) and AFAIK my > > proposal _barely_ goes beyond that... > > There is a difference between really _being_ _limited_ and using constructs > just for fun. How much of the code would suffer from writing it in Bourne > shell > syntax?
I don't think the code would be maintainable anymore. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
