Dennis Clarke wrote: > The README.opensolaris is pretty silly as > it is just plain wrong. Again. BFU is gone as are "Pre-built BFU archives" > and forget a source tarball. That is all history.
Argh, sorry, I missed this when I was reviewing the code changes that removed them from the deliveries. Could you file a bug, please (solaris/consolidation/os-net-docs)? > The developer reference ( > http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+on/devref_2 ) refers > to /opt/onbld/bin still but there is nothing at > http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b143/ that looks like onbld > anymore. Yeah, the DevRef didn't get updated, either. :-( That should go in the bug report, too. > If the answer is "yes, that really is the golden source with FCS > Quality" then I have to ask "How does one build that?" I think the main change, once you've gotten the source via Mercurial, is that you now have to bootstrap the tools (whereas before a pre-built copy of the tools was available). There's a bootstrap recipe at the botttom of http://static.opensolaris.org/on/flagdays/pages/20100422161952.html If there's still something unclear, let me know. mike _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
