> Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> The README.opensolaris is pretty silly as >> it is just plain wrong. Again. BFU is gone as are "Pre-built BFU >> archives" >> and forget a source tarball. That is all history. > > Argh, sorry, I missed this when I was reviewing the code changes that > removed them from the deliveries. Could you file a bug, please > (solaris/consolidation/os-net-docs)?
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=16395 Probably filed all wrong but I did not see a classification for docs anywhere. > I think the main change, once you've gotten the source via Mercurial, is > that you now have to bootstrap the tools (whereas before a pre-built > copy of the tools was available). There's a bootstrap recipe at the > botttom of > > http://static.opensolaris.org/on/flagdays/pages/20100422161952.html OKay, that looks like a good read. I see a reference to : nightly(1) no longer generates the tools tarball - you should be using the tools from your workspace, per Mark's heads-up message http://onnv.sfbay.sun.com/flagdays/pages/20100303235050.html. See below for more instructions on bootstrapping your workspace if required. Well that is an internal url so I don't know what that would be. > If there's still something unclear, let me know. OKay, thank you very much. I'll flail away and see what happens. I have snv_138 running ( the onnv part anyways ) and that should be okay to build snv_143 ( or whatever the "golden source" rev is ). This will be educational either way. -- Dennis Clarke dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
