I agree it is early to criticise but that's also when you can easily address
the criticism. Regarding my ability to criticise the processes - I am talking
as a independent watcher rather than a contributor or a zealot and I talked
all of my things based on facts. I think I explained them in a fairly easy
understandable language.
<br><br>
>I've contributed to several open source projects over the years, and
quite frankly SUN's isn't much different from others (code
contribution process wise). It's just that their initial submission
part is a bit more thorough in the analysis of a contribution. But I
don't see anything wrong with that.
<br> <br>
If you don't see a problem, well fine, that's your point of view. I don't want
to criticize there. I see a big problem with the words "SUN's <i> processes
</i>" and it is not scalable as far as I can tell - but let's give some time
and see for sure.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
