Shawn Walker wrote:
On 9/5/05, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/5/05, S Destika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes - Reiser3 , contrary to what people are saying is a good, stable FS which has it's
benefits above others. <br><br>
Reiser4 seems to be getting stable but I don't know for certain. (Feature wise
it' s more promising than any of the other existing file systems on Linux but
not sure if any one immediately needs that kind of features.)
corrupt my data once, shame on you...
corrupt my data twice, shame on me.
Same story here, though I could say the same about early versions of
XFS for Linux. I can't recall a single case of data corruption that I
could blame on ext2/ext3.
I had ext3 blow up and wedge my SMP box several times in the earlier
days of ext3; I got tired of the fsck's and worried about my data
integrity. I had much better luck with resierfs; never had any problems.
So, base on our various experiences, you can't conclude anything about
the relative stability of these filesytems, only that everyone has
experienced some problems with each of them.
Yes, it would be nice to be able to read one or more linux filesystem
formats, but it's not a deal breaker for me, nor for many other people
either (IMO)--the kinds of people that run linux or solaris are the
kinds of people that will have a spare box (or more) hanging around that
they can bounce files off.
--Wez.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
