On Tue 15 Nov 2005 at 04:11PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 11/15/05, Dan Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue 15 Nov 2005 at 03:50PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > I just saw this : > > > > > > fsck -F ufs -Y /dev/rdsk/c0t0** /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 > > > < snippage > > > > I did rerun fsck again and I get the same message over and over. I > > > suspect that something else must be happening here. I may boot with > > > the cdrom just to verify. > > > > Yes, there has been work done on fsck recently, in snv_22: > > > > 1260290 RFE: fsck error: UNKNOWN FILE TYPE describes multiple error > > conditions > > 4836779 fsck requires multiple runs to clear up DUP or BAD blocks > > 4845221 ufs/fsck can't handle filesystem name argument > > 4857410 ufs_sync_indir() walks off the end of the i_ib array > > 4872089 fsck almost always reports FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK > > 4890510 fsck can't properly recover the filesystem > > 5086715 ufs fsck has memory leaks > > 6175186 fsck should not need to be run multiple times > > 6208131 fsck needs to be able to recover filesystem problems > > (nbfree,ndir,nifree > > ,nffree suspect) > > 6312941 PSARC 2005/044 UFS fsck rerun messaging > > 6312946 PSARC 2005/045 UFS fsck verbose option > > 6312949 PSARC 2005/051 UFS fsck automated search for a backup superblocks > > 6312954 PSARC 2005/043 UFS newfs/mkfs superblock calculation options > > > > whoa .. that is a lot of work done.
Yeah. A nice feature of the source browser is that you can now identify exactly what that change was: http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/diff/on/usr/src/cmd/fs.d/ufs/fsck/main.c?r2=1.50&r1=1.48 And you can search in the "history" box of the source browser for any of the bug IDs or case IDs above, and find the associated changes. Thank you Chandan!! -dp -- Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
