Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >... likes to become incompatible with OpenSolaris.
> >
> >
> >
> In my not so humble opinion, the concept of OpenSolaris compliant or
> OpenSolaris compatible is non-existent. (That's not to say I think
> that's good or bad, I'm just saying that's the way it is today. It's
> important people don't start thinking there is any meaning whatsoever to
> statements like "incompatible with OpenSolaris".)
If there are two ways to go. One is OpenSource and the other is not, then
it seems to be obvious that the non OSS solution os incompatible with an OSS
platform like OpenSolaris.
If you add optional software you may do what you like, but ksh is not
optional for OpenSolaris. Using closed source for non-optional code looks
like ging the incompatible way.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
