OK, pushing this along... Dennis Clarke wrote: > > Keith Wesolowski wrote: > > > > If the project name is your sole objection to the existence > > of the project > > No it isn't. Err, I mean wasn't. > > > or to a collaborative effort that would be inclusive of > > Blastwave, I'm more than willing to change it. > > I am now thinking that the only way to proceed is to > plow forwards with some sort of a discuss list...
Anyone else want to comment on this idea? (I don't have a preference either way. So +0 from me, sorry.) > > > Or to propose a second > > project (as a stand-in for the originally proposed community) > > and relegate the existing one solely to providing the source > > to the existing Companion consolidation. Suggestions? So far nobody has commented up or down on this idea. In case this helps, I believe it's the same as Stephen's suggestion for a way to handle the macintel project. See: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=7769&tstart=0 Comments anyone? Eric _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
