On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Darren J Moffat wrote: > So for me cdrw(1) is much more friendly than cdrecord(1), thats just they way > it is for me. > > I think it is great that cdrecord can do so much but for me the UI is too > complex and the man page is far too technical too quickly.
No disrespect to Jörg, but FWIW I wholeheartedly concur. (I really don't like the -longoptionname nomenclature, as used by find(1)). Perhaps what we could do is make cdrw report errors more accurately, in the way cdrecord (apparently) does. -- Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CAB member President, Rite Online Inc. Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638 URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
_______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
