Darren J Moffat wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps engineering resources that went into making OpenSolaris
>>> GCC-friendly would have been better spent porting SS10 to other
>>> platforms? Were I the manager that had the power to decide, I would
>>> have certainly pushed in that direction, not the other way around.
>>
>>
>> The reasons those engineering sources were spend was because it was
>> not clear that the studio compilers would ever be gratis.
>
>
> We also now have a fantastic system for building the source with
> multiple compliers.  Using multiple different compliers is a great way
> to find "interesting" bugs in the compiler and in the code you are
> building.
>
> Also the Studio compilers are free to use but they are not open source.
>
> The other huge advantage that being able to build with gcc brings is
> when porting to other platforms; using gcc as a cross compiler - which
> is something Studio can't do.  The PPC port of OpenSolaris wouldn't
> have gotten very far if this wasn't possible.
>

Absolutely, finally!

DISCLAIMER: I do like gcc  (and I refuse to apologize for this).
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to