On Wednesday 31 January 2007 09:34 am, Stephen Harpster wrote:
> We're wondering if this would increase participation.  There are a lot
> of GPL bigots out there.  If OpenSolaris were available under GPL, would
> there be more people willing to participate who have to date ignored us
> because we're CDDL only?

Stephen,

Speculating about participation based on a license is far fetched. There are 
many other things that would help assist that more than a license, such as 
Source Code Management, Bug Reporting, and full access to all Sun cases (if 
that piece is not done already, I think much of ARC is).

> Also, the thinking is that the open source community at large will adopt
> GPLv3 and hence a dual-license would make it easier to have OpenSolaris
> use that larger body of work.  Of course, that presumes that the open
> source community accepts GPLv3.  If they don't, then dual-license may
> not buy us anything.....

I don't see why they won't, but we'll have to wait until it is out to see.

-- 

Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 Engineering - IHV/OEM Group
Advocate of insourcing at Sun - hire people that care about our company!


_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to