* Adam Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-14 00:24]: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:15:56PM -0800, Joe Little wrote: > > The recent fix-only release of B54 and B55 were a breath of fresh air. > > We utilize OpenSolaris builds in one fashion or another in production > > both at Stanford in my role there as well as where I consult for use > > in file servers. Again, I look upon recent features, fixes, and I'd > > like to jump to newer releases. However, at the same time I see a lot > > of churn and potentially unstable putbacks that just need a bit more > > time to flesh out. > > > > It would be great if OpenSolaris as a whole went through regular > > stabilization builds or otherwise followed a scheme whereby those in > > production or quasi-production modes may feel safe in adopting series > > of builds most likely not to give them unwanted headaches and also > > improve upon previous builds in their infrastructure. > > That sounds like a great idea especially for people who are planning on > deploying Solaris Nevada or building software solutions out of it. Would > it be sufficient to have, say, two builds of stabilitzation every 3 months > or so?
At the beginning of January, we talked a bit about this on opensolaris-code. See http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=21240&tstart=50 and associated references and replies. I am trying to push the consensus there into the build schedule. - Stephen -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
