Laszlo (Laca) Peter writes: > > This covers the case where we already have "N" of something, and "N+1" > > comes along. Provided that "N+1" follows all the norms for such > > things (it isn't deliberately doing something 'unusual'), it can be > > self-reviewed. > > Hmm... I don't think I can word the initial ARC case in such a way > that adding a new binary to /usr/bin or a library to /usr/lib > does not count as > o "introduc(ing) new interfaces visible outside their own project"
Fair point, though it really does depend on the particulars of the case. Even so, I think that immediately presuming that the ARC's bandwidth for fast-tracks will be a limiting or significant factor in handling such cases is probably a bit premature. Let's fix the problems we actually experience rather than imagining new ones we've yet to encounter. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
