>On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Correct; I think that Sun will need to change that attitude and define >> a process for itself in which it limits the bits of OpenSolaris it >> ships as part of its distribution *or* finds a way to "do the community >> thing" and ship the drivers as "community supported only". >> > >Perhaps the problem is that all drivers are in ON?
They are not, really (I seem to remember we had quite a few non-ON drivers such as fiberchannel) >[For myself, I am currently restricted to ON by Nemo still being >consolidation private; roll on getting a published interface] What other consolidation would you prefer? Or would you like some OpenSolaris things to exist outside consolidations? The whole consolidation thing is, of course, largely artificial. Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
