Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lars Tunkrans wrote:
>
> > The automount by HAL and rmmount did not mount the UDF filesystem
> >
> > All it did was mounting a HSFS where a little text file " readme.txt"
> > with
> > the following message appeared.
> >
> > "This disc contains a "UDF" file system and requires an operating system
> >
> > that supports the ISO-13346 "UDF" file system specification."
>
> I have a WinXP CD/DVD recording package that insists on putting both a
> UDF & HSFS filesystem on the disk when you select UDF as the required
> format, which makes reading them on Solaris a right pain. Is this some
> sort of a standard, or is the software vendor trying to be 'helpful' by
> including the HSFS filesystem?
This is what mkisofs does and it may be that a lot of other software works
in a similar way.
It is good practice to add hsfs for compatibility and the current mkisofs
version even supports to archive files up to 8 TB while it can only support
files up to 20 GB on UDF.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
