On 11/09/2007, W. Wayne Liauh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wayne, that is not a fair criticism at all. > > > > In fact, my experience with b72 on my custom-built > > workstation at home > > has been quite the opposite. > > > > All of the problems I had with b70 were fixed in b72, > > and the SATA > > support is actually there now for my system. > > > > As far as slow/broken downloading, I set the Sun > > Download Manager to > > download the release during lunch yesterday and when > > I came back home > > from work it was done. > > > > No torment here... > > > > -- > > Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > > http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ > > > > "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved > > it correct, not > > tried it. " --Donald Knuth > > _______________________________________________ > > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > I suppose build 72 would have been OK if it (1) did not devastate my build 71 > slice or, (2) it's GNOME/CDE desktops were not broken. > > Wrt (1), there is no crying over spilt soy milk. But how is your GNOME > desktop? If it works on your machine, then there could be something wrong on > my installation and I am willing to re-install build 72. >
It works for me, although I haven't used it much yet, so take that with a "grain of salt" :) However, I also did a clean install as I experienced data corruption under b70 (which now appears to be gone) that had randomly overwritten files in /etc with pkg prototype data. It is unfortunate that you are having issues... -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. " --Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
