I guess the question is, is ZFS more stable in SXCE, or Solaris 10. I
think this question misses a lot. I would say that SXCE's ZFS
implementation has features added and bugs fixed. Generally bugfixes
will be backported to S10 within a matter of months. So if you don't
mind missing out of features, I would say S10 is a) easier to
maintain, and b) designed to be as stable as possible.

I personally would decide do a feature comparision of ZFS S10 to ZFS
SXCE, and see if there are any "gottahaveit" features in SXCE that you
will need. If not I strongly encourage you to go with S10 for
production purposes.

-Brian

On Nov 14, 2007 1:39 PM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In production environment, which platform should we
> > use? Solaris 10 U4 or OpenSolaris 70+?
>
> That shouldn't even be a question.
> If you want a stable operating environment, you'll want the latest Solaris 10.
>
> If you're looking to *develop* against the bleeding/cutting edge, a latest 
> build of OpenSolaris will do.
>
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
>



-- 
- Brian Gupta

http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to