Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> So, why use GDM instead of KDM then? Other than "because it's there" ?
>> If someone wants to make KDM support Solaris, I think that would
>> be great. As I explained, I think a11y support was the main reason
>> we picked GDM over KDM initially.
>
>>From my understanding, this would either need a binary standard for C++
> or a way to define a different LD_RUN_PATH for gcc compiled binaries.
Why? KDM is an application, not a library.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
