On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:14:52 -0500 (EST)
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> > On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:36:13 -0500 (EST)
> > "Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Sorry for the confusing subject line but this is really just about OpenSSH
> >> as implemented in Solaris ( and various derivitives ) and any issues that
> >> may exist between the OpenSSH team and the Solaris world.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> So the short answer here is that I don't know what the Sun implementation
> >> of
> >> SSH is really but it seems to be NOT what we see at the source site. So
> >> that
> >> really is the only reason why I tend to run the packages built on
> >> reference
> >> servers that I trust and with source code drawn directly from the well.
> >>
> >> Am I wrong to think this way ?
> >
> > No.  At least not in my opinion.  From what you've described we can
> > essentially conclude that "if it doesn't say OpenSSH, then you don't
> > know what's inside".
> 
> Well, the source is open and a diff of the portable OpenSSH with the SunSSH
> bits would be most interesting to drag out into the light. In this way we
> could look at what, if any, differences exist.

lol...  yeah, I almost added "in absence of code audit" but 1) it was
late at night and I wanted to get to bed, and 2) figured that was
obvious. 

> > That, in and of itself, would be plenty enough for
> > me to favor your package build over what Sun bundles.
> 
> Well not so for me. Not quite good enough. I feel like inserting an
> automotive metaphor here but it is too early in the morning and I'm tired of
> using cars to explain computers.

fwiw, I've been running OpenBSD since circa 2.5 days, or thereabouts.
Can't quite remember precisely, but companies I left ran left those
things on the net essentially unmaintained for years and they never got
cracked.  So if you go with a version that OBSD bundles with a RELEASE,
then you're probably pretty safe.  btw- yes, I know OpenSSH did not yet
exist for those early versions, but you get my point.

> If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck and looks like a duck.
> Then that Sir is what I call a duck.
> 
>     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test
> 
> 
> but it is different .. isn't it.

Yep.

fwiw- here's from a even older OBSD box:

$ ssh -V
OpenSSH_4.3, OpenSSL 0.9.7g 11 Apr 2005
$ uname -rs
OpenBSD 3.9

and aes256 is still supported.  So Sun has apparently w/held some of the
strong crypto stuff. I'll leave the rest up to the conspiracy
theorists... 

-- 
Best regards,

Ken Gunderson

Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to