On Feb 4, 2008 11:40 AM, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If someone at Sun is interested to take the current code, he is welcome! > > > I am currently working on fixing bugs in "sh" and making it portable > > > enough > > > to allow it to be included in the "schily consolidation" > > > > Joerg, pardon, but Roland and many others did all of the work to get > > /sbin/sh to be replaced by ksh93. > > AFAIK, there is no decision to replace /bin/sh by ksh93.
I believe there is a plan to do that though, and that it will eventually happen. > And BTW: there are a few places where sh differs from ksh93 by definition. > How do you like to deal with this problem? >From what I can remember, the ksh93-integration team is working on the issue. They have ways to deal with the few differences that currently exist. I encourage you to join ksh93-integration-discuss, or to read the mailing list archives there. I think you'll be surprised at just how much has been done. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
