"Richard L. Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Why do you believe the presense of these lines could
> > change my statement?
> > My statement was based on the fact that you are
> > running a halfway recent SX
> > release and I mentioned that in theory, Solaris
> > Express _could_ be kept up to
> > date as a whole and not just in parts.
> >
> >
> > Jörg
>
> Until such day as Solaris stays much more up-to-date, there's always
> blastwave, although even it isn't quite current.
Blastwave not not much out of date, cdrecord -minfo works
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
