> It's an interesting idea, but I think it needs some > clarification. Do > you mean organization within the OpenSolaris > community itself or > within Sun? > > If you mean the community, then we don't really have > that yet. We > have Members, Contributors, and Core Contributors > (among other > designations), but there's not much in the way of > hierarchy. I > suppose it might be possible to create such a chart > anyway, though it > might be tough to keep it up to to date. (Whose job > would that be?) > > If you mean Sun, I'd suggest just dropping it. Such > information is > generally considered proprietary information, and > carefully guarded. > There's no way I could see it being published. At > best, you might be > able to get selected folks to identify themselves by > rank, and then > only when it's in a particular context where that > information somehow > matters. > > Otherwise, just go by name. There are a lot of us, > but we all have > names. ;-} > > -- > James Carlson, Solaris Networking > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 > 442 2084 > MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N > Fax +1 781 442 1677 > _____________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > [email protected]
I just mean something like this: http://www.us.debian.org/intro/organization Though probably not as extensive. Just looking for the roles on the project/product and who fills them. From the outside it feels like talking to a cloud. As if the "open" thing hasn't been totally figured out yet :) I see what you mean about the Members, Contributors, and Core Contributors thing. If that infrastructure was more appropriately designed, the information would be more accurate and usable, and you could automatically produce an org chart from that. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
