Hi;

Mark R. Bowyer schrieb:
[...]
> I'm not really in the right bit of Sun to answer that.  My understanding 
> is that Solaris Next will look a lot more like OpenSolaris than it looks 
> like Solaris 10 right now, though.  For instance I believe the packaging 
> system will be the new pkg, rather than the old pkgadd.

This in my opinion does raise interesting questions, most important in
my opinion whether Sun will or will not have power / resources to
permanently keep a "sane" IPS repository up and running? So far,
comparing to, say, Ubuntu or Debian, the IPS repositories available to
OpenSolaris users are somewhat small to say the very least... ;)


> Solaris 10 is sticking with the versions of Gnome and other libraries it 
> initially shipped with to ensure binary and source compatibility, and 
> any required bug fixes are ported back to that.  And if you were an ISV, 
> paying to test your software on every release you supported, that's what 
> you'd want.  

Agreed without second thought. Us being lucky enough to "just" have Java
applications based upon any of these platforms (Linux, Solaris), we
couldn't care less... :] Nevertheless still I am into preparing our next
server deployment for glassfish to be either OpenSolaris or Solaris 10,
haven't yet made up my mind which one to go for. :)


[...]
> again, and so we'll need a Solaris Next release fairly soon to allow all 
> this fantastic work out to the customers who demand the full Solaris 
> platform, with all the support and compatibility guarantees that entails.

Won't "commercially-supported OpenSolaris", possibly following a release
/ lifetime scheme like Ubuntu, be a way outta here?



> That is after all one of the main things Solaris has over Linux, beyond 
> the technology.  Until recently my old SunOS binary of Mozaic 0.9 beta 
> still ran on a Solaris system, although it's ability to render pages 
> became less and less useful ;O).  Try running a 10 year old binary on a 
> current Linux system.

Out of nostalgia I actually once in a while lean back having a glass of
red wine browsing the web using an ancient Netscape Communicator on
Linux. But I guess static builds don't count here. ;)


> And how unreliable it's been until the latest update.
> Although I have had to do a complete reinstall through it once already, 
> and it worked brilliantly =O)

Yes I also enjoyed the idea in terms of features, but, honestly, I just
dislike the UI which in my opinion is a little too much "effect bashing"
to be seriously used... ZFS snapshots, so far, are less spectacular but
overally seemingly way more effective.


> But now - this being OpenSolaris - there is absolutely nothing to stop 
> you writing such a thing yourself ;O)

There is something stopping me, actually two things: Time and
experience. ;) Maybe being a Java developer in first instance, this is
not the right kind of tool to create a nautilus addon. However I
consider these things interesting for OpenSolaris, as so far, from a
desktop users point of view, OS 2008.05 has little "new" / specific to
offer... :(

Cheers,
Kristian

-- 
Kristian Rink * http://zimmer428.net * http://flickr.com/photos/z428/
jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * icq: 48874445 * fon: ++49 176 2447 2771 "One
dreaming alone, it will be only a dream; many dreaming together is the
beginning of a new reality." (Hundertwasser)


_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to