Micah Leier writes:
> Where would the right place to ask be?

I'd go for [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the "why can't I add drives
slowly to RAID-Z?" question, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
general Solaris Volume Manager questions.

> also, it's not so much that I'm daft, its that I need a large array that can 
> be expanded slowly, and performance isn't that important. Adding a drive 
> (which people have asked about a ton) is impossible with RAID-Z, and this 
> seems a pretty decent work around, which makes me wonder why no one has 
> mentioned it before, I figured there must have been some huge caveat or 
> something, hence the somewhat stupid questions. Also, I think your answers 
> are out of order as you can't add a drive to a RAID-Z.

I can think of a few reasons not to do this, but they might not apply
to you.

  - Most (perhaps all) of the current development work is focusing on
    ZFS.  Working off of the beaten path means you won't get as much
    attention.

  - It's much harder to administer SVM than it is to manage zpools,
    and it often requires very careful planning to get right, and
    there are many more ways to hurt yourself.

  - I'm not so sure SVM does a great job using incrementally-added
    drives with RAID-5 ... I seem to recall needing to set up a
    concatenation of RAID-5 volumes in order to get it to work well.
    (But my memory could be faulty there.  I mostly just don't wanna
    go back to the days of managing metadb replicas.)

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to