[email protected] wrote: > >I did personally read the agreement and I found two time bombs that I like > >to be > >fixed before I am going to sign it because I have a more wide spread > >>commitment > >with my contributions than the majority of the involved people. Because of my > >more wide spread commitment, I am affected by the named time bombs. > > > >I hope that this problem can be solved, but the original topic of this thead > >was > >GNU utils vs. Solaris utils. I lilke to stay on topic. > > Joerg, you claim about some "time bombs" but you also say that you > gather from your own reading. > > I'm sure that the Fraunhofer institute has multiple lawyers and I'm > certain that they have lawyers who are specialized in IP.
There is nothing like "The Fraunhofer Institute" and our institute has no lawyer. I am however doing enough contract and law related stuff to know that a contract that was written in an ambiguous way has a high probability to become missinterpreted later. All I ask Sun is to remove the ambiguous parts. Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
