a b writes: > > > When saying something like that, it helps quite a lot of you can cite > > the actual CR number so that others can help either rescue the CR (if > > it's in need of rescue) or provide a more comprehensive explanation. > > The CR is 681661 > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6811661
That's all you needed to supply. The CR was closed by [email protected], who noted in the evaluation that vold is gone, Tamarack replaced it, and that Tamarack *does* handle ZFS storage pools. The CR was then updated by [email protected], who noted that Tamarack did do this, but that the methods it added are not invoked by USB hot plug, so that's still a problem. I'll leave it up to Artem (whom I've copied) to explain why he just updated the Evaluation field and didn't either reopen it or change the status, but my guess would have to be that this CR (given as a "see also" to the CR you cite) is the reason: 6786446 hald doesn't handle zfs formatted hotplug media and raises an error dialog. Fixing that problem would fix the problem you later reported in 6811661, making your CR effectively a duplicate. > Is my time completely worthless? Should I have to worry about such details, or > should I be able to use Solaris to get work done, and get it done fast and > efficiently? You probably shouldn't assume that developers are either (a) trying to thwart you deliberately or (b) actually paying attention to your individual needs. Software development is just not the same thing as paid support. If you need paid support, there are solutions for that, but arguments on opensolaris-discuss probably won't get there. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
